經濟人類學在六十年代上半期，會為了能否廣泛廉用經齊學理論的問题，引起形

经济人类学在六十年代上半期，会为了能否广泛廉用经齐学理论的问题，引起形式论派与质论派之间的争论。<br><br>然而，遭种争论在1966年以后，已逐渐减少，因乌双方都觉得所持论点并不在同一层面上而难有结果。实际上，道种争论亦是源于不同前提的假定。道可由他们争论的内容，及对Tiy舆Siane的经济研究之比较分析中看出。最少，有十点的差异:有无明显的研究目的兴假设;是否明确地使用经侪学的概念;是否使用计量的方法;使用规范模式或策略模式;以人或社会文化篇分析的出发点;以人或社会篇主勤者;觎理性乌最大利润的追求或最低需要的追求;功能是否包含非经济面;探时方式;及有否类推。自然，以上十点常只是程度上的不同。<br><br>道种前提舆方法上的差异，加上孤立之原始社会逐渐消失，以及社会要求实用的趣势，轻济人类学转向经齐发展的问题上。一方面，道更可发挥其特点，另一方面，也是对理论之争所留下的问题荨求解答

经济人类学在六十年代上半期，会为了能否广泛廉用经齐学理论的问题，引起形式论派与质论派之间的争论。<br><br>然而，遭种争论在1966年以后，已逐渐减少，因乌双方都觉得所持论点并不在同一层面上而难有结果。 实际上，道种争论亦是源于不同前提的假定。 道可由他们争论的内容，及对Tiy舆Siane的经济研究之比较分析中看出。 最少，有十点的差异：有无明显的研究目的兴假设;是否明确地使用经侪学的概念;是否使用计量的方法;使用规范模式或策略模式;以人或社会文化篇分析的出发点;以人或社会篇主勤者;觎理性乌最大利润的追求或最低需要的追求;功能是否包含非经济面;探时方式;及有否类推。 自然，以上十点常只是程度上的不同。<br><br>道种前提舆方法上的差异，加上孤立之原始社会逐渐消失，以及社会要求实用的趣势，轻济人类学转向经齐发展的问题上。 一方面，道更可发挥其特点，另一方面，也是对理论之争所留下的问题荨求解答

In the first half of the sixties, economic anthropology will cause a dispute between formalism and qualitism in order to make use of the theory of Confucian classics widely and cheaply.<br>However, after 1966, the number of controversies has gradually decreased, because both sides feel that their arguments are not on the same level, so it is difficult to have results. As a matter of fact, the debate on Taoism stems from different presuppositions. Tao can be seen from the contents of their arguments and the comparative analysis of the economic studies of tiy and siane. At least, there are ten differences: whether there are obvious research purposes and hypotheses; whether the concept of peer learning is explicitly used; whether the measurement method is used; whether the normative model or strategic model is used; whether the starting point of human or social and cultural analysis is used; whether the person or social main agent is used; whether the pursuit of maximum profit or the pursuit of minimum need is coveted; whether the function includes non economic aspects; time exploration method; And so on. Naturally, the above ten points are often only different in degree.<br>The differences in the ways of the presuppositions and methods of Taoism, the gradual disappearance of the isolated primitive society, and the practical interest of the society, make the light economic anthropology turn to the problem of economic development. On the one hand, Tao can give full play to its characteristics. On the other hand, it is also the answer to the questions left by the theoretical dispute<br>