记得、前两年有几位博士生，走访一位著名的哲学教授。当老教授问及:“20

记得、前两年有几位博士生，走访一位著名的哲学教授。当老教授问及:“20世纪最伟大的哲学家有几人”时，学子们众说纷纭。而教授本人认为有四位。四位中，只有一位是所有学子们没有猜到的，那就是:爱因斯坦。也难怪。因为在我们的哲学中，完全把爱因斯坦排斥在哲学的殿堂之外。只要読読《爱因斯坦文集》第一、二、三巻，就会深感爱因斯坦确为地垉道道的哲学家。我们以往対爱因斯坦的理解，不在于爱因斯坦没达到哲学家的水平，而是我们対哲学的理解太偏颇、太狭隘。

记得、前两年有几位博士生，走访一位著名的哲学教授。当老教授问及:“20世紀最偉大的哲学家有幾人”時，学子們衆説紛紜。而教授本人認為有四位。四位中，只有一位是所有学子們没有猜到的，那就是:愛因斯坦。也難怪。因為在我們的哲学中，完全把愛因斯坦排斥在哲学的殿堂之外。只要読読《愛因斯坦文集》第一、二、三巻，就会深感愛因斯坦確為地垉道道的哲学家。我們以往対愛因斯坦的理解，不在于愛因斯坦没達到哲学家的水平，而是我們対哲学的理解太偏頗、太狭隘。

I remember that in the first two years, there were several doctoral students visiting a famous philosophy professor. When the old professor asked, "how many of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century were there", there were different opinions among the students. And the professor himself thinks there are four. Of the four, only one was not guessed by all the students, that is: Einstein. No wonder. Because in our philosophy, Einstein is completely excluded from the palace of philosophy. As long as you can read the first, second and third volumes of Einstein's works, you will feel that Einstein is indeed a philosopher of Taoism. Our previous understanding of Einstein is not that Einstein did not reach the level of philosophers, but that our understanding of philosophy is too biased and narrow.<br>